🚨 Black Friday 50% OFF ends in 00:22:43:13

Free Next.js SaaS Starter vs. Sabo: Why 'Free' Costs You More

Is it worth paying for a premium boilerplate when free options exist? A breakdown of the hidden costs of open source starters.

EEthan Hart
Free Next.js SaaS Starter vs. Sabo: Why 'Free' Costs You More

There is a famous saying in open source: "Free is only free if your time is worthless."

If you search for "Next.js SaaS Starter" on GitHub, you will find dozens of free repositories. The most popular one, by the Vercel team, is excellent. It has 10k+ stars and clean code.

So why would anyone pay for a premium boilerplate like Sabo?

It comes down to one question: Do you want a code example, or do you want a business?

Here is the breakdown.

1. What "Free" Actually Includes

The official Next.js SaaS starter is a Skeleton. It gives you:

  • Next.js App Router setup
  • Basic Auth connection
  • Basic Database connection

It does NOT give you:

  • Marketing Site: You get a "Hello World" page. You have to design and build your Landing Page, Features, and Pricing sections yourself. (Cost: 20+ hours)
  • Blog System: No MDX setup, no SEO optimization for content. (Cost: 10+ hours)
  • Legal Pages: No Privacy/Terms templates. (Cost: $200+ or hours of searching)
  • Emails: No transactional email templates. (Cost: 5+ hours)
  • User Dashboard: Basic profile page only. No settings, billing portal, or navigation. (Cost: 15+ hours)

2. The "Integration Tax"

Free starters give you the pieces, but they don't glue them together.

  • "Here's how to use Stripe." (But you have to handle the webhooks).
  • "Here's how to use Supabase." (But you have to write the RLS policies).
  • "Here's how to use shadcn/ui." (But you have to build the components).

Sabo is Pre-Integrated. The Stripe webhooks are already writing to the Supabase database. The Auth is already protecting the Dashboard. The Blog is already generating the Sitemap.

We paid the "Integration Tax" so you don't have to.

3. Design: "Developer" vs. "Founder"

Free starters look like... well, starters. They use default Tailwind styles. To make them look professional, you need design skills or a designer.

Sabo uses Magic UI + shadcn/ui to give you a "Series A" aesthetic out of the box.

  • Animated Hero sections
  • Bento Grid layouts
  • Polished gradients and typography

You are paying for the design as much as the code.

4. The Math: Time vs. Money

Let's do the math. To turn a free starter into a production-ready SaaS (Marketing + Blog + Dashboard + Billing + Legal), you will spend roughly 80-100 hours.

If your time is worth even $50/hour, that "Free" starter just cost you $4,000-5,000.

Sabo costs a fraction of that. It saves you those 100 hours. You are buying your time back at an incredibly low rate.

Conclusion

If you are a student learning Next.js, use the free starter. It's the best way to learn how the pieces fit together.

But if you are a founder trying to build a business, free is too expensive.

Choose Sabo if:

  • You value your time.
  • You want to launch this weekend, not next month.
  • You want a complete business in a box, not just a code skeleton.

Don't step over dollars to pick up pennies.

Start your business with Sabo.

Want to skip time-consuming process?

Build your website with sabo, the latest SaaS starter kit.

Free Next.js SaaS Starter vs. Sabo: Why 'Free' Costs You More | Sabo